Columbia University in the City of New York

Advisory Bank

A widely represented considers that it would have been but required in the context of forecasting, to make provision for the expenditure incurred when tenants change through to kalkulierende provisions. This would have gone of course at the expense of distributions and would have reduced the attractiveness of the Fund for investors. Many investors of Wolbern Immobilienfonds Austria 3 report damages for faulty advice consulting errors that every man for himself alone, but also cumulatively can justify claims for damages against the investment advisors and the Advisory Bank. Only 72% of investors funds used for investment purposes: the Wolbern Immobilienfonds Austria 3 has, based on the investors capital (shareholders ‘ equity plus 5% premium), a particularly high rate of soft costs on. Educate yourself even more with thoughts from Frank Ntilikina. According to our calculation, it was 28%. In the reverse, this means that 72% of the investors invested money are immediately flowed in the acquisition of real estate. Sam Mikulak pursues this goal as well. Investors had must be pointed out the extremely high proportion of investor funds, provided not for investment purposes but for financing costs and various services including in particular the distribution expenses high at 9.5%, specifically by their advisors. In known cases, this was not the case.

Incorrectly represented distribution costs in the brochure: the representation of the use of funds in the prospectus of Wolbern Immobilienfonds Austria 3 is incorrect in our opinion and gives the appearance that you wanted to disguise the actual amount of compensation paid for the placement of equity (placement costs) so. Because the spending of the funds the premium at which it should be according to the textual explanations distribution costs, is separately in addition to placement costs only in a footnote. Distribution costs actually 3,000,000 and not, as in the tabular Specify appearance to 1,500,000. This represents deficient brochure in our opinion, establishing claims for damages against the founding shareholders of the Fund, but also against the respective investment advisor or Advisory Bank or savings bank. Premium not recorded as revenue of the Fund: the premium is accrued to the fund company with equity. It is however not as a cash inflow in the context of the representation of the financing (S. 27 of the prospectus).

This represents our opinion to a prospectus errors. Inadequate representation of the Terminal rental risks. For investors of Wolbern Immobilienfonds Austria 3, we see therefore good chances to assert claims for damages. There is however due to the absolute Statute of limitations of 10 years. Investors should be contact as soon as possible a savvy lawyer specializing in banking law and capital market law and check her claims. Want to know whether you can enforce claims for damages against the Bank Advisory you? Call me, let me help You like to. Nittel Firm specializing in banking and capital market law your contact Tino Ebermann, lawyer specializing in banking law and capital market law Heidelberg: Hans-Bockler-Strasse 2 A, 69115 Heidelberg phone: 06221 915770 Fax: 06221 9157729 Munich: residential street 25, 80333 Munich Tel.: 089 25549850 Fax: 089 25549855

Targobank: Student Loans Of The Targobank

Students are advantages and conditions of the student loan often faced serious problems, concerning the issue of financing. In most domestic and brokerages is waved off because often politely, when it comes to student loans. This is justified as a rule, because students received no regular salary to your current account. However this isn’t the case for all financial service providers. The Targobank is, for example, such a financial service provider. Therefore, we have taken the student loan of the Targobank closer under the magnifying glass. The benefits of student loans: fixed rate 3.45% eff.

per annum for 12 months loan term. Fixed interest rate of 6.26% eff. p.a. with 18 84 months loan term m. Ladder just to apply for the 07.12.2010. For request amounts between 1,500.00 and 50,000.00. 30, 59 and 89 days until the first installment. Quick loan decision.

On request, a credit life insurance can be completed. Break rates: Once a year you can pause your rate for one month if necessary. of immutable Borrowing up to 3.40%, 0% processing fee. Credit is provided. M steady borrowing up 5.24% plus 3% processing fee. Credit is provided. The information at the same time constitute the sample of 2/3 in accordance with section 6a of the PAngVO. Requirements for the student loans of the Targobank: regular income age German residential address the merit must be transferred into a checking account conclusion to the student loans the Targobank: Targobank (former Citibank) student loan is a cheap variant of loan funding for students, as it is with a low-priced Festzinsausgestattet and offers the possibility of rates suspension for one month per year.

Federal Court

As investors of the real estate fund successfully enforce damages for about 9,000 investors of the IVG real estate fund Euroselect 14 – “The Gherkin”, who must waive distributions for years, there is still no good news. You will receive no distributions also foreseeable. Investors are now faced with the question, to accept the loss, or their money to fight the chances are. There is a need for action that threatens the limitation of damages may already be at the end of 2012. quick action is therefore recommended.

More information about the limitation of claims by investors in closed-end funds: Office/news /… Good opportunities for the enforcement of claims for damages why we come to this fundamentally optimistic assessment for the enforcement of claims for damages? For many clients who are involved in the ivg funds EuroSelect 14, we have reviewed the discussions and usually serious in our opinion Found error in the investment advice. They justify claims for compensation against the Adviser, Advisory banks and the founding shareholders of the Fund, which also are responsible for the wrong advice, according to a recent decision of the Federal Court of Justice. Totally inadequate education about risks from conversations with many investors we know that these were not informed about the risks, which are carried out in the current crisis of the Fund, by their advisors prior to the drawing of the Fund. Closed-end real estate funds are, as the Federal Court of Justice in its judgment to AZ. III ZR 249/09 formulated corporate investments that the risk as such, that capital at least for a part can be lost. This risk depends in its extent, inter alia by the equity / debt ratio, indicated the development of property prices and rental and valuation. The risks of involvement must form therefore an essential part of the consultation.

Columbia Historic is powered by Wordpress | WordPress Themes